My math teacher, Mr. Payeur and I decided that interviewing students and teachers just wasn’t enough. So to take my project to the next level, I went down to the Scout and Co. Coffee shop with Mr.Payeur and talked to strangers our math program. We figured since we had gotten opinions from people in the school why not see what people outside of school have to say.

During the coffee shop visits, I interviewed two college graduates with very different opinions on our math program.I asked them to compare our math program to the way they did math in high school and I asked which they would prefer.
The first person I interviewed was a woman named Lindsay, who majored in philosophy in college. When talking about her math experience in high school, I noticed that it was very similar to the way we did math last year. Things like algebra, trigonometry, and precalculus were separate math classes, kind of like the way IMP’s were divided last year. IMP 1, IMP 2, and IMP 3 were all separate math classes. After talking about her math experience I explained the way our math program worked. I told her about how it was all on computers, and how it was all problem-based learning. I told her that the teachers didn’t really give you direct instruction and you would explore the math on your own. because it was a way to work at your own pace. After discussing both our math experiences I asked her if she could go back to high school which math program would she prefer and she said ours. She had said that integrated classrooms seemed pretty cool, and that some students may prefer the classroom taught classes because they really didn’t have to learn. With the math program students are learning even more because they’re doing it on their own, hence problem based learning. She suggested that instead of having all students work the same way, they should divide the students into learning types. Put those who like to work independently with others who like to work independently. Put those who like to interact and do hands on learning with others who like to interact and do hands on learning. Rather than making each student work in a way that isn’t benefiting them.

The second person I interview was a woman named Jamie, who majored in environmental studies in college. Like Lindsay, I asked Jamie about her math experience in high school and she had said similar things to what Lindsay said. The classes were pretty basic classes like, algebra, trigonometry, and precalculus. Again, like the IMP’s last year, they were divided into different classes. After explaining our math program I asked her which math she would prefer and unlike Lindsay she said she would have still prefered to do the math she use to do. She had said that the way she use to do math is better because seemed to be easier than the way we do math.
As you can see both these people had different opinions on our math program, and I thought it was good to get out and see what other people who haven’t experienced math the way we have to understand what it was like. I thought that maybe if the public thought that the old math was better than the way we do math now, it might help my argument for changing the math lab. From my two discussions I discovered that your opinion on the math lab will vary depending on who you are and how you learn. Which means the math lab should stay open to any suggestions that could make it better for students. Keep commenting and leaving suggestions, visit my blog again for the latest insight on the math lab.
